home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: informatik.tu-muenchen.de!fischerj
- From: fischerj@informatik.tu-muenchen.de (Juergen "Rally" Fischer)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: signal(task,ctrl-f) legal ?
- Date: 15 Apr 1996 12:55:05 GMT
- Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <4ktgv9$7jv@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hphalle5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
- Originator: fischerj@hphalle5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-
-
- It would be difficult to implement a sigbit beeing already present
- for each task that calls my Qblit routines.
-
- So I just let cleaup() cause a ctrl-f signal to the waiting task ;)
-
- "Unexpected" ctrl-f signals (i.e. user typing ctrl-f) are compensated
- by use of the usual flag.
-
-
- So is this a compatible way to do it ?
-
- (BTW the sigbits are defined in dos/..
- Am I right only processes have the ctrl-.. sigbits already allocated
- but not tasks ?)
-
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- fischerj@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Juergen "Rally" Fischer) =:)
-